A Member Speaks Regarding HB 3108

This is may take on this issue:

 

HB 3108 is a concerning bill and one that every state employee should be watching.  The employee benefit allowance that we receive has been in the sights of the legislature for the last few years and is drawing a lot of attention this year.  The excess amount of the benefit allowance that employees don't use directly for insurance purposes is included with their paycheck.  A lot of us use the amount to cover health insurance expenses like co-pays etc and contribute it to health care spending accounts, so it’s still really going for healthcare. 

 

 

For those employees who have been around awhile and have seen how it works, you know that the benefit allowance changes each year and as a result so does whether or not you have any excess benefit allowance left over after you've paid for your insurance options.  For me, some years I've had an excess amount left over and some years I have not.  

 

 

 

OPEA states that they are “NEGOTIATING" with Ron Peterson on this HB 3108. Some state employees are taking issue with OPEA's position, but before they do, they should consider the following facts:

 

 

1)  The legislature, including Ron Peterson are under no obligation to negotiate with anyone regarding legislative matters.  They are charged with the task of making law and are not required to ask any group or any individual state employee how this bill or any other would affect them.   They can make a law without any input.  Mr. Peterson and the rest of the legislature can pass this bill without any additional compensation to state employees. 

 

 

2)  OPEA is an organization that is made up of several thousand state employees and lobbies on behalf of the interest of all state employees whether or not those employees pay dues.  The majority, if not all of the staff at OPEA are former state employees who still have a vested interest in seeing that state employees are well taken care of. 

 

 

The 34,000+ state employees need to have a unified voice in responding to issues such as this, and OPEA is the best choice by which to get this voice amplified.  OPEA is at the capital every day and has frequent contact with legislators so that the voice of state employees can be heard directly.  OPEA's agenda is mandated by the state employees it’s employed to serve.  The saying, "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer" would seem to apply here.  The legislature can either be a friend or an enemy to state employees.  In either case, I would say keeping them close by way of contact through OPEA is the way to go. 

  

I definitely don't want to lose any pay I'm currently receiving but because the excess benefit amount can change each year, and some years there may not be any excess amount at all, I am interested in possible alternatives and most assuredly want to have a voice in this process.   OPEA is the clear choice for that and is working hard to see that state employees have the best outcome on this bill as well as any other bill that would potentially affect us.

 

I would invite state employees to consider joining OPEA if they have not already done so and to come to the OPEA Lobby Day at the state capital on 3/11/08. As state employees, if we do nothing we will lose out big time. 

11 comments (Add your own)

1. Lynn wrote:
I have looked into joining. Besides the fee, which was a bite to the budget 7 years ago let alone now - I had a problem with the OEPA requiring that the money be taken from the check. I work in a small agency that does not have one single OEPA member, and there is an anti-OEPA stance in administration. Unclassified, at-will employee agencies tend to get a bit tricky when it comes to organziational affiliations. You KNOW that the one that does the checks will make mental note of the deductions. I would consider joining and becoming actually involved if the OEPA would consider changing their payment requirements and allow for automatic deductions from the checking account itself, rather than the actual check.

March 7, 2008 @ 7:44 PM

2. wrote:
Even though I do not think I can financially afford to join at this time, nor am able to take the time to go to lobby day, I applaud everything OPEA is doing and believe they really are doing their best. If nothing else, we can help by contacting our legislatures and representatives, and, for those of us who believe in the power of prayer, appeal to a Higher Power.

March 7, 2008 @ 8:43 PM

3. wrote:
That is correct they dont have to "negotiate with anyone regarding legislative matters", but remember they can be voted out off office and will be voted out if they do something stupid like cut state employees benifits or pay. I am not sure what to think about OPEA's stance on this matter, I would tend to believe that there is something else going on that they are not telling us??? I am sure leaning on canceling my membership.

March 8, 2008 @ 1:03 AM

4. Renee wrote:
I have never cared if anyone knew I belonged to OPEA. In fact I have been proud of belonging because I thought it was getting stronger as a labor union. There is no job on earth worth hiding who I am to have it. I don't know where OPEA is going but if another union offers more, there will be a big drop in membership. Most people will not pay to get sold out. We need strong representation & it is sad to see the drop in confidence in OPEA that is occurring. People have problems in these agencies & they need HELP. OPEA was weak for a long time & it looked like it was taking a better course. Not so much now.

March 8, 2008 @ 9:28 AM

5. Tom McDonald, DHS Council Director wrote:
In response to Lynn in comment number 1. Lynn if you contact the OPEA office they will set up a way for you to pay your OPEA dues without them being a payroll deduction. There are several members who do this. They like to be able to control this aspect of their budget and pay. There are many ways of joining and paying without having to do a payroll deduction.

March 8, 2008 @ 10:05 AM

6. Lynn wrote:
#5 Tom - Thanks! I had not been offered any other option. I will by-pass the person heading our section, and contact the office directly. Appreciate the correction.

March 8, 2008 @ 12:57 PM

7. ???? wrote:
Troy had a different view on this when he said on another OPEA board:i would join but..." or "i would join if..." doesn't cut it any more. You are the reason OPEA has to talk instead of demand! You freakin non-joining-won't pay a dime-but enjoy the benefits scabs are useless. OPEA got us the benefit allowance and you sat by and raked it in without lifting a finger. So shut the hell up!
March 6, 2008 @ 11:22 AM

March 8, 2008 @ 1:29 PM

8. Paula wrote:
I have gone back and forth on being a member of OPEA. I got no response from leadership regarding the Gary Jones mess...so that's when I withdrew my membership. I expect integrity in both my state and union leadership. Otherwise I walk with my money or my votes...

March 10, 2008 @ 10:06 AM

9. Johnny Woods wrote:
The problem with HB3108 that has not been address is that the benefit cost will be based on the prior years health cost. Therefore, all increase in the health cost will be past on to the state employees paychecks. This is a bad bill that needs to go down to defeat. This year the legislature wonts to cut our pay through the increase in health cost and no raises. All this and it's an election year. Bad Move!!!

March 10, 2008 @ 3:35 PM

10. Curt wrote:
#10, another CWA member. For someone who claims to be "In the Know" you don't know very much. Unions operate in a collective bargaining environment and governed by negotiated contracts that are enforced by the courts or a local Employee Relations Board. If unions are so great, what happened to GM and Lucient? How about the Firestone and GoodYear plants?

OPEA is governed by the people, who vote on the agenda every year. My Board member does a great job of keeping us informed and taking our input! It may not be a perfect organization but I have never found one that is.

March 12, 2008 @ 8:06 AM

11. wrote:
Number 10, you show me a union in Oklahoma that would be willing to put in the time with the legislature that OPEA does. There are none. All they will do is take your dues and tell the daily Jokelahoman that they have been responsible for the state workers getting better pay, benefits, and working conditions when in reality the credit goes to OPEA. If you are spending your money on CWA, you are wasting your money. I am not saying to go spend it on OPEA either. Just giving you something to look into. They had me fooled when I first started working for the state back in 2000. I got wise to their game and cancelled payment.

March 13, 2008 @ 2:21 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.