UPDATED: Insurance Rates Set for 2011

 

State employee insurance rates were set on Friday, August 20 at the Employees Benefit Council and the State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board. The day brought good and bad news for employees.

 

OPEA had been concerned that the loss of an HMO would cause the benefit allowance to plummet, costing employees hundreds of dollars. Since the benefit allowance is calculated on the average of the high option plans, the loss of one of the plans could cause the allowance to fall, leaving state employees with fewer benefit dollars used to supplement stagnant incomes. 

 

According to OPEA’s preliminary calculations, the benefit allowance difference for 2011 ranges from a gain of $107 for employees carrying two children to a loss of $28.91 for employees only insuring themselves and a spouse.

 

Following is the benefit allowance for 2011.

     Employee   $608.53
     Employee plus child   $826.21
     Employee plus children   $954.19
     Employee plus spouse   $1,247.24
     Employee plus spouse and child   $1,465.92
     Employee plus spouse and children   $1,592.90

To view 2011 rates click here.

 

While the benefit allowance will still cover the price of HealthChoice, employees with HealthChoice will need to use more of their benefit allowance to cover the cost of insurance. According to OPEA’s calculations the range is $2 more for employees covering two children to $103 more for those carrying spouses only.

 

Aetna will be leaving the state plan in 2011.  Also, reports indicate CommunityCare will be changing its provider network in the Oklahoma City area.

Spouse rates continue to climb because of adverse selection. Employees with spouses who cannot work insure them with the state, causing usage and cost to increase. For example, the HealthChoice 2011 rate increase for employees was only 2.5 percent or $11. However, the spouse rate increased by 10 percent or $64.

 

While the cost will increase for some, the news is not all bad. State plans have made adjustments in plan design that should greatly benefit employees and their families. Since the co-pay for HealthChoice was increased to $50 in January, OPEA has met several times with OSEEGIB leadership to discuss concerns with the sudden change. At their rate setting meeting, the OSEEGIB Board voted to move the co-pay for primary care visits down to $30, with specialist remaining at $50. The lower co-pay applies to general practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatricians, physicians assistants and nurse practitioners.

 

In addition, well-baby and well-child visits are free. Adult participants will have one preventive office visit with lipid and comprehensive metabolic panel at no cost for lab or co-pay for the office visit.

 

The HMOs will also be making plan changes to help state employees and their families and comply with the recent federal healthcare legislation. No-charge services will include:

  • Blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol tests
  • Colonoscopies
  • Routine vaccines for diseases such as measles, polio, or meningitis
  • Flu and pneumonia shots
  • Counseling, screening and vaccines for healthy pregnancies
  • Regular well-baby and well-child visits, from birth to age 21

 

“The changes in preventive care and lowering the co-pays should be beneficial for state employee families,” said OPEA Policy and Research Director Trish Frazier. “With problems detected and addressed earlier, families will stay healthier.”

 

“Unfortunately, the loss of one of the HMOs in the benefit allowance calculation, will cost some state employee benefit dollars at a very difficult time,” Frazier concluded. “OPEA is especially concerned rural areas are still not provided choices that employees who reside in urban areas are offered. The association will continue to work on obtaining the best value for benefit dollars and allowing all to have choice.”

 

Medicare retiree rates are anticipated to increase slightly and will be set in the middle of September. 

17 comments ()

1. Bobby wrote:
Any information on when the medicare rates for retirres will be posted?

Mon, August 23, 2010 @ 7:54 AM

2. Bobby wrote:
Thanks for the update on retirees.

Mon, August 23, 2010 @ 3:27 PM

3. Wes wrote:
"The HMOs will also be making plan changes to help state employees and their families and comply with the recent federal healthcare legislation. No-charge services will include:

•Blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol tests
•Colonoscopies
•Routine vaccines for diseases such as measles, polio, or meningitis
•Flu and pneumonia shots
•Counseling, screening and vaccines for healthy pregnancies
•Regular well-baby and well-child visits, from birth to age 21"

What ahout HealthChoice? Will we receive these no-charge services too?

Mon, August 23, 2010 @ 9:43 PM

4. jack wrote:
well once again state employees get screwed. I live in rural ok. I got furloughed last year , no pay raises in several years. I have no choices for state insurance. To insure my family at the levels i did last year my premuims went up 56.oo a month. Thanks for the wonderful health care reform by our wonderful president and federal congressman. Shame on the state of oklahoma for treating its employees this way. vote all uncumbents out of office. state employees deserve and demand better treatment than this.

Tue, August 24, 2010 @ 9:50 AM

5. concerned wrote:
What about the 30-Day or 90-Day Prescrition plan? Which Insurance will have the 90-Day plan? Global Health changed theirs to 30-Day right at the 1st of January & I was very unsatisfied about that. They changed it without notice.

Wed, August 25, 2010 @ 12:00 PM

6. Trish Frazier wrote:
Answer to question about pharmacy benefits: HealthChoice will remain at 30 days or 100 units, whichever is greater.

Answer to question about no-charge benefits for HealthChoice participants:
One free preventive visit per year for adults, including routine lab tests, well-baby and recommended preventive visits for children and adolescents.

Thu, August 26, 2010 @ 9:18 AM

7. SH wrote:
The no charge for colonoscopies will be a blessing, I paid a $250.00 copay this year for a colonscopy but no charge for mamogram or bone scan. I was also very unhappy about the 30 - 90 day prescription change with no notice. Did I understand you correctly Trish, if your doctor writes for 100 units instead of 90, that will be covered??

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 10:01 AM

8. MIKE wrote:
When do the co-pay changes take effect for HealthChoice? I have been paying $50.00 for the last several months.

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 10:21 AM

9. Roger wrote:
Are you guys for real? You people expect us to believe that it cost this much to insure a family of three. Quit lumping everybody together and insure them on individual merit. I realize some people have health issues that warrant higher costs, but, because they have these issues the insurance system and medical profession see a blank check. Even with insurance families are one illness away from financial ruin, and with the rates charged to have insurance, the people live paycheck to paycheck. Reform the system

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 10:26 AM

10. JKC wrote:
Community Care isn't much better. The co-pay for an MRI on my wrist cost me $200.00 in co pay. Last year when I had an MRI on my eyes. It was $100.00 co-pay. That is a little rediculious, DOUBLED.... Community Care changed their co-pays and I wasn't notified that I recall anyway. And it wasn't at inrollment time either.
BUT....I guess I could be without Ins. at all, and that would really be a bad thing for me.

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 10:26 AM

11. JKC wrote:
I was just looking at the allowance we will be getting for the insurance, it doesn't even cover the Community Care, much less vision and dental. With furloughing, I guess I won't be getting vision and dental. And I left a Private Prison Company to come to work for the State because the benefits and retirement was better!!! ha! What a JOKE that has turned out to be....boy, have I made a big mistake.,,,

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 10:40 AM

12. Wes wrote:
The health care reform isn't the cause of the insurance going up. Most of the provisions of the health care reform don't go into effect until 2014.

Mon, August 30, 2010 @ 2:18 PM

13. Marie wrote:
The federal government health care reform is not responsible for this mess in oklahoma. Medical cost has been getting worse over the last 4-5 years. My family does use the 100 unit option on prescriptions and we save as much as 1/3 the cost. Its like three months for the price of two. It does not work for all drugs however.

Tue, August 31, 2010 @ 4:42 PM

14. Max Power wrote:
Let us be real....the state would have more money to pay for premiums if they would quit returning the excess benefit to us...then you have those that double insure their spouse to make more money...people we have state question 744 coming up...if this thing passes it is going to get really tough on all of us...by the way Wes..sister works for a large corp.insurance company..pretty high up in the system there..she told me that have gone up and will go up more as more of the provisions come into being...

Wed, September 1, 2010 @ 4:50 AM

15. Debi Hopkins wrote:
Would insurance premium be cheaper if we just had one provider?????I have just been with the agency for 2years and I have been disappointed with Community Care. Previously I worked for a small federal grant of 20 people and our insurnace was not near as expensive.

Wed, September 1, 2010 @ 1:50 PM

16. Jason wrote:
I have just started working for the state almost in 6 months and at my last job it cost me 305.00 dollars a month 3660.00 a year for my son and I to be covered and with minium co-pay like 20 and 30 dollars for visits and prescriptions. The state says we have a 826.21 benefit allowance on employee and child. My son has been to the emergency room twice in a few months and I have had to shell out for the visits a total sum of 523.86 so where is the benefit? "At this rate he would have to be admitted" for anything to come back to us the employees and with the monthly premiums that we pay should cover alot of the visit which do not. I could be pocketing the money or putting it into an investment account and be way ahead with intrest than what we are being charged with. 826.21 X 12= 9914.52 a year would cover most healthy people for 10 years in life only in the early years of life and older years would cost the most. Lets see 9914.52 X 10 = 99,145.20 and most healthy employees have not spent this much in a 10 years for doctor visits and medicine? I wonder what the intrest if invested right would be after 250 families and 10 years????? 250 X 99145.20 = 24,786,250 divide that up and that is only 250 families for 10 years. And we wonder why we are furloughed!!!!

Wed, September 1, 2010 @ 2:33 PM

17. KE wrote:
Why can't we have a benefit allowance and have the option of finding our own insurance providers? I can't imagine that we are getting a better deal by using the health insurance companies the state chooses for us. I am eternally grateful for the benefit allowance, but we are being squeezed more and more, and there just aren't too many more concessions I can make besides getting another job. And by the way, I firmly believe this increase in cost is due to insurance companies having to cover future costs incurred as a result of the Obama healthcare plan. Funny we never got a chance to vote on something so significant....

Wed, October 6, 2010 @ 1:06 PM