OPEA Calls for Special Session to Deal with Corrections Budget

 

The Oklahoma Public Employees Association is calling on Governor Henry to bring the legislature back into special session to address the serious funding issues at the Department of Corrections. An incident at the William S. Key Correctional Facility in Fort Supply left an inmate in serious condition.

 

“This is only the beginning,” said OPEA Executive Director Sterling Zearley. “Furloughs and lack of funding are creating a dangerous situation in our corrections system. The combination of Oklahoma’s hot summers, overcrowded prison and low staffing because of furloughs is only inviting a catastrophic incident resulting in further injuries or worse.”

 

To balance the FY 2010 budget, the agency has already cut inmate programs not funded through grants. Vocational training areas were transitioned to living areas for inmate growth. The agency reduced private prison and half-way house rates and closed training facilities. In addition, DOC kept vacancies open and implemented buy-outs and a small reduction-in-force, lowering staff to a dangerous 73 percent.

 

The FY 2011 budget, which begins today, continues the serious funding challenges for DOC. The projected population growth of over 700 offenders and other unfunded mandates creates a $45 million budget gap. To help balance the budget for FY 2011, DOC has implemented furloughs beginning in July.

“Every day the corrections system is underfunded and employees are furloughed is a day staff and inmates are in danger,” concluded Zearley. “The citizens of Oklahoma expect and deserve public safety to be a high priority.”

24 comments (Add your own)

1. cinnamon wrote:
right...at a $1000 a day per person( without mileage) on special session....where that money coming from?

Thu, July 1, 2010 @ 3:32 PM

2. J D Colbert wrote:
Staffing shortages due to budget cuts as well as furloughs implemented for the same reason do create dangerous conditions in our facilities. This alone is reason enough for adequate funding to manage the agency. However, furloughs have far reaching impacts including the economic impact on local communities and the state that will occur when staff paychecks are diminished due to furloughs. Furloughs amount to many thousands of dollars per furlough day that won't be spent in the grocery, gas stations, convenience stores, and other businesses in employees local community service areas. Not to mention people who have to make a decision between food and fuel due to short paychecks.

Thu, July 1, 2010 @ 3:42 PM

3. Vivian wrote:
I think the legislature should have to take furloughs, Oh that's right they don't work but 4 months out the year anyway so that wouldn't work. But they should have to take pay cuts and that would be a big chunk in reducing the budget as it does include their salaries and a bunch of frivolous un-necessities. I work for DOC and have not had a raise in 6 years even though the cost of living keeps going up. But the legislature keeps giving themselves raises and that is not fair. I don't make anywhere near the $100,000 that they make a year starting salary and I have to work two jobs just to make ends meet. How fair is that. Again the State legislators need to take large pay cuts to help reduce the budget. And I will be looking for candidates that definitely have my best interest in hand, which is more raises for state workers that make under $100,000.

Thu, July 1, 2010 @ 3:49 PM

4. Larry wrote:
Thank you OPEA. I work inside a correctional facility and it's not good right now, we need some help.

Thu, July 1, 2010 @ 4:03 PM

5. asat wrote:
Do like they do in Oregon.

The legislature only meets every two years.

Have a constitutional ammendment to require a balanced budget in the first 90 days then 30 days for other matters then go home and work for a living!

Outlaw all lobbyist gifts and have a prison sentence of twenty years(wanna cut DOC huh!)for corruption!

Whew!

Thu, July 1, 2010 @ 5:21 PM

6. Phyllis wrote:
I worked for DOC for 14 years and I make less than $32,000 dollars a year. I have to ask for help from family members and sometimes others to make ends meet. I ask for financial assistant because I don't get paid enough to pay them back.

I think that each time a State Agency have to go on an furlough, so does the Legislators’.

Even though they only work 4 months a year they still get a paycheck; so we should ask the Governor to cut the legislator’s check by 30% since they were stupid enough to allow a State agency whom protects the public and the legislator’s families from harm. The County and the City workers get paid more than the State Agencies & the legislators called themselves smart & educated, how SAD!

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 8:36 AM

7. Mark wrote:
The incident at keys is only the begining of the problems we are going to have. The inmates are not stupid and they can see that we are understaffed. Is it going to take staff getting hurt before this legislature does anything??

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 10:19 AM

8. Sher wrote:
I make less than $27,000.00 a year. I will be loosing right at $200.00 a month. The average cost of incarceration per inmate is 50.00 a day. What it boils down to is because the state is broke, they decided to let me to pay for the keep of 1 inmate for 48 days. Then my husband will get to pay for him for the next 3 months after that. We all get to take turns paying for their keep. ?????? It makes you scratch your head and wonder what just happened.

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 1:29 PM

9. Mark wrote:
Why is it that the Dept. of Corrections director Justin Jones and several of the departments deputy directors and other administrative staff have recieved substantial raises in the last 4 years. The daily oklahoman reported on former director Ron Wards retirement that he had been paid just over $111,000/yr. and that the department was "Financially Shaky." Just about 4 months later Jones was hired at $120,000/ yr. Director Jones now is paid 132,000 / yr. Mr. Jones i hope you read this. As far as furloughs go. Someone please explain to me how this is going to save money. We are so short staffed we are requiring double shifts at several facilities. If we furlough an employee who could be paid straight time then have to require another employee to pull a double shift and pay that employee time and a half to cover the furloughed employee, how exactly have we save any money. That would appear to me to have actually cost more money. Not to mention the fact that the performance level of an employee who is required to work a 16 hour shift will go down by approximately 50 percent during the second half of that shift.
So someone please explain this to me. The way i see this is either the math that i was taught in school from kindergarten up is all wrong or our leadership just simply cannot understand common sense. Either way the answer is simple WE NEED A CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 2:27 PM

10. Jim wrote:
Mark,

Unfortunately that’s usually the case...it has to cost them allot of money, bad press or someone is killed.

Pathetic isn’t it!

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 2:52 PM

11. L wrote:
THERE HAVE ALREADY BEEN TWO STAFF ASSAULTS AT WSKCC IN MAY ONE OFFICER REQUIRED 17 STITCHES. IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE UNLESS THINGS ARE CHANGED.

Fri, July 2, 2010 @ 8:50 PM

12. Tom wrote:
The sad part about this is that Oklahoma has the highest incarceration rate of women, single mothers, etc than any other state. We also have the highest incarertion rate of NON-violent offenders. Most are drug possession, etc. If we could get at least 1/2 of these poeple into treatment instead of locking them up we could save a lot of money and not have to furlough DOC employees. We also need to cut the amount of money we pay to private prisons by at least 2/3.

Sat, July 3, 2010 @ 6:30 PM

13. Rick Allen wrote:
After 26 years with DOC I don't believe I have ever seen this agency facing the types of issues it is facing today. DOC has been very inovative with programs for inmates but has failed to support the FTE in the same manner. When they talk about FTE being at 73% they are including all staff. Even the ones in OKC that don't venture into any facility. Oklahoma has let the private prisons get too deep into Oklahoma tax payer pockets. There has to be sentence reform. The 85% crimes started with 11 crimes. Now it's at 23 crimes. It's crazy. If our legislators want to keep every one locked up then they need to fund the system. It's either that or start letting inmates out. But that approach will not get them re-elected. So what happens now is the share holders of private prisons keep getting paid and the staff keep losing money. If there is to be change let it start when we go to the poles this fall to vote. We have to educate our legislators and more so we ourselves have to get more educated on how to make change happen. We the people can make a statement when we all get on the same sheet of music. We start by voting out the legislators that state employees deem as unteachable. Then we start building educational relationships with our legislators. The process will benefit our legislators and us. Three questions to ask your legislators; What did you do for me last week, What are you doing for me this week, What can I do for you.

Tue, July 6, 2010 @ 11:01 AM

14. Jr wrote:
I think the only way we can get anyone to listen to us is by someone getting killed or mass riot. It is sad but with people in power like SEN. Glenn Coffey who does not look at the real issues at hand but how much will it effect him. Truely explain to me the logic of stricter laws that are almost unconstitutional when you can (or shall we say the truth WILL NOT) fund the very institutions and departments that will have to take care of said new offenders. Even if we all went and truely picketted the stepps of the state House and Senete every day from now till something happens the leaders and their workers will just walk by and ignore us till someone dies.

Tue, July 6, 2010 @ 1:01 PM

15. bhk9 wrote:
I for one am tired of DOC Director Jones using his front line staff as pawns to get more money.After 20yrs in the department I have seen alot of wasteful spending, but since Jones has got in it seems to have gotten way out of hand. The resemblance between our government in Washington and our DOC administration is very scary.Obama and his Czars and Jones and his deputy Directors. I agree with Mark, enough is enough.I too hope Jones reads all this and gets the hint, but I really doubt it will do any good until a frontline officer gets really hurt. Oh yeah-lets cancel visits,that saves alot of money and gets the Inmate population something else to get pissed about.Smart move whoever came up with that bright idea.Just another case of Upper Mgt incompotency. Keeps your heads low and your backs to the wall, it's gonna get tough.

Wed, July 7, 2010 @ 12:31 PM

16. sam wrote:
Here's some good "evidence based BS" lets put our CO's in harms way so we can get some more money.

Wed, July 7, 2010 @ 12:36 PM

17. Wasteful wrote:
Let's talk about wasteful spending. I recently transported a community level offender, for 5 hours one way, waited in the Lindsay waiting room for another 5 hours

had a 5 minute doctor visit. The offender got told we'd reschedule him next month.

then drove another 5 hours back home. That does seem a bit wasteful to me.

Then like a good community corrections Officer, I comped the time off because we are not allowed any overtime.

Thu, July 8, 2010 @ 6:01 PM

18. RiotsInOurFuture? wrote:
No kidding! Another wonderful example of overspending.....lets talk about CTU (for those that don't know, thats Correctional Transport Unit) having to make 2 trips a day, 4 days a week to my facility to bring us ONE inmate or to drop off ONE inmate. This is usually when we have several bunks open and ALL of the moves could be done at once. Gas prices today are crazy. Why can't those people at Population Management not get those moves scheduled in one or two days? There's not a good enough reason why they can't. Some of those moves come out on Statewide Moves two and three days in advance. I am at a small facility so I can only imagine what it's like at a larger one. The state would save a FORTUNE in gasoline and wear and tear on our vehicles.

And to Mark who wrote:
"If we furlough an employee who could be paid straight time then have to require another employee to pull a double shift and pay that employee time and a half to cover the furloughed employee, how exactly have we save any money. That would appear to me to have actually cost more money. Not to mention the fact that the performance level of an employee who is required to work a 16 hour shift will go down by approximately 50 percent during the second half of that shift."

Kudos to you!

It didn't make sense when they made the furlough decision (when we had more officers) and it makes even less now that we have lost several officers due to the VOBO's, fear of losing so much money, and just down right LOW MORAL. It's tough for officers and non-uniform staff to come to work every day knowing they are putting their lives in danger for people who don't give a damn about them. "Big Wigs" and Inmates alike!

Sun, July 11, 2010 @ 7:09 AM

19. Why not tell the truth wrote:
Ive worked for Corrections for many years and i still take home min/wage after they get through chopping up my check. Ive heard alot of officers talking about quiting because of the bull sh-- they have to deal with. Who's going to run the prisons then (FEDRAL) I see it coming.

Oh, I forgot to think Health Choice for uping the co pays where I can not afford to go to the doctor now....but DOC keeps paying them. With the furlows I would be better off working in a convenance store... Yes Im job searching

Sun, July 11, 2010 @ 3:38 PM

20. Brett wrote:
We all know the state goverment dosent give a care for any other state employee as long as they get their pork projects and all the good face time.

Sun, July 11, 2010 @ 7:46 PM

21. u-figure wrote:
2 Officers @ $16 hr = $32 hr. times 8 hrs = $256 a day. 1 Officer @ $16 hr. times 8 hrs = $104 + 8 hrs @ time and half @ $24 hrs = $192 + $104 = $296 - $256 difference of $40 dollars. The state saves just $40 by hiring 2 officers. Now figure in benefits. The state doesn't have to pay benefits on a second person paying time and a half.
Someone else will have to figure the value of benefits. The state may save a little. That very little they save shows just how much they feel your life is worth! Now by hiring the other person they are putting one more person to work, spending money, who also pays taxes, but the person they spend their money with pay taxes, who is also a little more busy who then needs to hire someone, who pays taxes, and has a job, who spends money, and it goes on and on, and on, Get the idea!

Mon, July 12, 2010 @ 9:51 AM

22. Who's Stupid? wrote:
How smart is this...
Started furloughs...at first we were not allowed overtime. Furloughs start and now I have worked 24 hours of overtime in one week and so has several others at my facility. Now we have a sign-up sheet for voluntary overtime. Huh, go figure that we save money by furloughing and spend 1-1/2 times as money in overtime (PER EACH FURLOUGH DAY). Somebody does not know how to add payroll. 3 days of overtime = 4-1/2 days of pay. BUT go ahead and let me off a day without pay. STUPIDO'S!!!

Mon, July 12, 2010 @ 12:43 PM

23. Victims - Where are you??? wrote:
We need the victims advocate groups all over this issue. No matter what Justin Jones says - victims YOU ARE AT RISK! THE PUBLIC SAFETY IS AT RISK!

Mon, July 12, 2010 @ 12:45 PM

24. Dean wrote:
Escapes at 3 minimums in the last 3 days, I wonder how many more to come?

Tue, July 13, 2010 @ 12:35 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.