Deferred Payment Plan Would Keep Workers on the Job and Save the State Money

 

In light of Oklahoma’s current budget shortfall, OPEA continues to work with lawmakers to keep cuts to state employees at a minimum.

 

OPEA worked with Representative Randy Terrill, who chairs the appropriations and budget subcommittee on public safety and the judiciary, to develop a plan that will benefit state employees.

 

“This is yet another example of how OPEA works to protect those in public service,” said Executive Director Sterling Zearley.  “No one wants to see RIFs or furloughs, but if we can implement a plan like this it will help keep people on the job.  Already some employees at agencies like the Office of Juvenile Affairs are experiencing furloughs; so this is an opportunity to save some money.

 

“This plan is simply an alternative for state employees if their agency begins furloughs.  They don’t have to participate…they can still take their furlough day off without pay.  But if they choose to stay on the job, they can receive an addition to their annual leave, or to their retirement.  It will keep them working, and save the state some money during these tough economic times,” Zearley said.

 

A press release from Terrill’s office detailing the new plan follows below.

 

Voluntary Deferred Payment and Early Retirement Plan

Provides Alternative to Furloughs and Saves State Money

 

OKLAHOMA CITY – A plan allowing state employees to voluntarily defer their pay rather than take unpaid furlough days as well as initiating and expanding early retirement buyouts would save the state significant funds during these tough economic times, state Rep. Randy Terrill said today.

            “We are in a bad economic environment and it is clear that the size of state government is going to shrink as a result,” said state Rep. Randy Terrill, a Moore Republican who chairs the appropriations and budget subcommittee on public safety and the judiciary. “For the next couple of years, we are very likely to be on an downward trajectory. The purpose of the voluntary deferred payment and early retirement plan therefore is not to avoid the inevitable, but simply to provide tools for better management and planning of the process as it occurs.”

            Under the deferred payment plan, state employees could voluntarily choose to work instead of taking an unpaid furlough day in return for receiving some form of compensation at a later date.

            “The deferred payment plan would help ensure continuity of services and many workers would obviously prefer it to a furlough, which is essentially a pay cut,” Terrill said. “The plan also gives state agencies greater flexibility as they manage the economic downturn and the associated budget and staffing reductions that are now occurring.”

            The deferred compensation could come in several forms, Terrill said, including providing workers with some type of additional leave accumulation (exempted from current caps on annual leave) or perhaps even some form of enhanced retirement benefits.

            Terrill said the deferred payment plan could be crucial to maintaining core state services in a cost-effective way, “particularly agencies that are 24-7-365 operations like prisons, the highway patrol, veterans centers and mental health facilities.”

            For example, although the Department of Corrections could furlough an officer, the agency would then have to find another employee who would be paid time-and-a-half to staff that very same position. Terrill said the deferred compensation plan would provide a more reasonable alternative to that somewhat bizarre scenario.

            Terrill said the deferred payment concept has not been tried in Oklahoma, but has been implemented in a few other states. Workers could still choose to take a furlough day instead of deferred compensation under the plan.

            Terrill also called for immediately initiating and expanding early retirement buyouts in state government, providing incentives for all workers within two to three years of full retirement to voluntarily accept a buyout offer.

            Currently, early buyouts typically target workers within one year of retirement. The Department of Corrections was recently able to vacate 119 positions through an early retirement offer.

            “One agency was able to reduce 119 positions by simply buying out those within months of full retirement,” Terrill said. “Imagine what would happen if we expanded that across all of state government and included every employee within two to three years of retirement. You would achieve a significant savings while also doing right by those workers.”

            The buyout would include payment of a worker’s next longevity check, allowing workers to cash out all unused annual leave, payment of 18 months of the employee’s health coverage, and an early retirement incentive that could take several different forms.

            Excluding teachers and higher education employees, there are more than 35,000 state employees each earning an average of approximately $35,000 annually plus benefits.

            Based on extrapolations from the Department of Corrections retirement buyout, Terrill noted a statewide program could vacate as many as 1,500 government positions.

            “An aggressive early retirement program could generate an almost immediate 4-percent decrease in the state government workforce and save $52.5 million annually plus another $15 million in benefits,” Terrill noted. “And, $67.5 million on an annual basis is certainly not an insignificant sum.”

            If teachers and higher education employees (who earn more than $40,000 per year on average) were ultimately included in the buyout plan, the savings could triple to more than $200 million per year, Terrill noted.

            “The scope of the economic downturn is going to last more than one fiscal year, so it makes sense to expand retirement buyouts to those who would likely leave during that time frame,” Terrill said. “The early retirement plan would involve some upfront expense, but it provides a huge back-end savings as we go into the next fiscal year and beyond.”

            The Oklahoma Public Employees Association this morning endorsed the deferred payment plan and the use of statewide VOBO’s as a method to help ease the state’s budget crisis and reduce the needs for furloughs or large-scale employee reductions, said OPEA Executive Director Sterling Zearley.

            “The morale of the state workforce is being decimated by the current furloughs and RIF’s,” Zearley said. “This will not fix the current budget situation but it will certainly help ease some of the anxiety as well as give agency leaders more flexibility as we move into the next few fiscal years.”

 

 

14 comments (Add your own)

1. irritated wrote:
Really??? This is a good solution? State employees are already absorbing a greater workload under the new budget constraints with more of the public applying for benefits than ever before. And now, you suggest it will help the budget to have fewer employees to do the same or a greater amount of work. That does make some sense, but does it help the employees especially when we know there is little to no chance of seeing a raise anytime soon. I would like to know what sacrifices the Legislative Branch is going to make themselves to help us through this situation?

Fri, December 4, 2009 @ 3:57 PM

2. wondering wrote:
How about the legislature starting the ball rolling by having a special session for free? How about politicians taking a pay cut and work a few days a month for nothing? Then we will know how serious they are.

Sat, December 5, 2009 @ 7:06 AM

3. Kelly wrote:
I think this is a good idea since our agency can't fill all the vacant positions it has anyway. Many of my co-workers are ready to retire and are eager to leave, while it will be difficult to get by without them, it will help make sure we don't get RIF'd. I like the proposal

Sat, December 5, 2009 @ 8:47 AM

4. Corrections Employee wrote:
I'm a case manager and I'd do it only because there will be nobody there to do my work while I'm taking my furlough day, so I'll be doing the work at home for free anyway, like I'm doing today, Sunday. However, in saying that, according to the Labor Board it's not legal so we'll see. I think we need to be looking at our Health Insurance, the legislators will be going after our benefit allowance this session, also the extra money paid for spouses and dependants, they need to look instead at why the private sector pays 129.00 for a family of 3 with a 5.00 co-pay and we're paying 1000.00 for a family of 3 with a 50.00 co-pay, somethings not right here folks....

Sun, December 6, 2009 @ 9:37 AM

5. ***** wrote:
who among us would work for free for an iou from the government? aren't there employees still waiting to get pd or annual leave for this same stunt back in the 80's?

Mon, December 7, 2009 @ 10:37 AM

6. ***** wrote:
oklahoma elected officials should get pd for only the months they are in session like Texas. I took my representatives salary and added in his per diem and came up with $56,000 a year for three months work??????

Mon, December 7, 2009 @ 10:40 AM

7. Outside the Box wrote:
I think there would be people willing to take voluntary furlough days. There are employees with 2 incomes who may be willing to do this. I know that I would. I really like the idea of only paying legislators for the months that they are in session too.

Mon, December 7, 2009 @ 12:48 PM

8. FattCatt wrote:
It used to mean something to be a State employee...great pay, insurance, retirement, etc.
Today the media portrays State employees as being no better than scum...WHY!
There should be some kind of respect for us...some put there life on the line, others sacrifice having any family time and just about everyone is working extra hours or taking work home with no extra pay or comp time. This dedication that State employees have to the state of Oklahoma goes un-noticed and with NO appreciation.
State employees should not have to fear for their jobs, we should be the most protected in times like these to keep vital services that are needed now more than ever, available to the citizens of Oklahoma. No one from the Governor’s office has made any comment if, we didn’t have OPEA we would be aware of none of these problems.
The most disheartening thing is that all this is coming down right before Christmas...and our lawmakers are sitting back watching all State employees freak out and wonder if they will have a job come January 1...what a bunch of heartless crap!
Yes, it used to mean something to be a State employee...not anymore.

>*x*<

Mon, December 7, 2009 @ 12:53 PM

9. Can't see wrote:
What happened? How could our great leaders (we trusted) not make reasonable projections regarding the tax base in OK? Is it more greed? I watch TV and the OKC mayor reports OK is one of the most stable economys in the country. Oklahoma has been stable for years. So what happened? I am still spending my whole pay check just to scrape by each month. I think everyone else I know is in the same boat (It sure does not go as far but it does go). We need leaders who do not have personal agendas and continue to give tax breaks to those who do not need it.
State employee have been abused for to long, the way things appear to be going now, State employee's will be switching off, on non-paid working days off coarse, trying to process applications for co-workers needing support to feed thier families and keep the light bill paid but since you are a State employee we will cut your benefit in half.
Speaking of insurance, ...a family friend gets 10x's the insurance. Example she reports her family of 4 gets coverage (for bout $200.00 a month) the same insurance if I elected would cost me over $1,200 out of pocket to purchase after my allowance through what the State offers, and she works for a mom and pop company.
Just confused by it all, especially when I have a degree putin all this time but a person off the street can walk in and be on the same pay level. Or have a friend without an education tell you that their job actually pays overtime so they made $10,000 more than you did last year working in a warehouse though you put in just as many hours, the differance, you get paid 1 time a month and are exempt. The choices we make and the sacraficies that go unapprectiated.

Mon, December 7, 2009 @ 3:43 PM

10. ***** wrote:
I too wonder about our insurance. I'm one of the thousands of state employees with a second job. If i were to go full time at my second job it would cost $190 bi-weekly to insure a family of four and have a $20 copay. What is the deal with our insurance costing thousands?

Tue, December 8, 2009 @ 8:11 AM

11. WhentheGoingGetsTough wrote:
Oklahoma will survive - even if it kicks state employees in the toosh. But with all the possible retirements, our services will be ailing and will need support by experienced workers. If a retired worker would be allowed to be a temp employee (no benefits of course), it could be a win-win means for some who can't afford to retire but can't afford to work with furloughs or deferred pay furloughs. The paycheck goes fast and nothing beats bread on the table to make working worthwhile.

Mon, December 14, 2009 @ 3:24 PM

12. Dixie wrote:
While this plan may not meet everyones needs, it is gratifying to see at least one lawmaker step up with some ideas that may prevent massive layoffs of state employees. Is it perfect, no, but then again I have not seen any other lawmaker come up with ideas to keep state government functioning. So if nothing else maybe this will stimulate some conversation to keep the doors open for the citizens of Oklahoma to access services.
Thanks Randy for your willingness to "Stand UP and Speak Out" on behalf of State Employees and the Services that we provide.

Tue, December 15, 2009 @ 2:12 PM

13. FattCatt wrote:
WhentheGoingGetsTough,

I disagree...your idea would open the door to more part-timers being hired and allow the State to give fewer benefits as a whole. They would clean house like Wal-mart and everyone will become part-time so they could avoid having to pay benefits.
Don't be willing to sell us all out.
The issue here is, Oklahoma will still be in trouble even after we recover from this economic crises.
Ask yourself why is it we are looked at by Forbes to be the most resistant and will recover from this recession more than any other state in the union? Something is wrong here and it begins with very poor management of state money and cutting to many taxes.
To hell with the emotions of the State employee...all around the office you can see the stress, anxiety and uncertainty on everyone’s faces and it sickens me to see how we are being treated by the Governor, Senators and Representatives of Oklahoma. I guess all State employees need to apologize to them for being gum they have to scrape off of the bottom of their shoes. I have never been more insulted and disrespected in all my life and feel like our Lawmakers look at State employees as scum.

I’m praying for all of us.

>*x*<

Tue, December 15, 2009 @ 5:19 PM

14. Jayar wrote:
I was at the Appropriations and Budget combined hearings. The legislators who were there appeared to be serious about trying to take care of business without burning employees. Sen. Terrel, particularly, asked very pointed and hard questions of the agency heads. Can't-see makes some valid points, but misses what is really happening to the state. Our state leaders didn't see it coming just like all the other states missed it. Did YOU know the price of natural gas would plummet like it did? I do so hope you let someone edit your comment if you send it elsewhere. Your spelling and grammer errors would belie your claims to a higher value than an "uneducated" employee. FattCatt is right about the part time plan. It asks an employee to retire, then do the same work with no benefits. But Oklahoma IS more resilient. Other states, with no constitutional deficit spending prohibition, are in much more trouble than we are. Times are bad and we don't get to be completely insulated from it. Any of you have a better idea? I am sure Randy Terrel would take any serious suggestions. Oh - and they don't get paid more for being in special session. It does cost money to have one, but not from their pay.

Thu, December 17, 2009 @ 3:34 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.