OPEA Executive Budget Review

Executive Budget

Six month pay raise and flat agency budgets

 

As part of his State of the State address to open legislative session on February 4, Governor Henry proposed a five percent pay raise for state employees.  The line, at the close of the speech, received a standing ovation from legislators.

 

“The response was one of the best throughout the speech,” said OPEA Executive Director Sterling Zearley.  “We are pleased that the governor included a pay raise as one of his budget initiatives.  Also, legislators clearly believe state employees should be a priority this year.”

 

At the beginning of session, the governor is required to submit a budget to state leaders. While the pay raise is a step in the right direction, it is important to examine the details.

According to the budget, the pay raise does not take effect until January 1, 2009, with a half-year cost of $32.7 million.

 

“State employees cannot wait 11 months for a pay raise,” continued Zearley.  “Our paychecks are already 12 percent below market.  Delaying the pay raise will only increase the gap between state employee pay and market, making it harder to catch up.”

 

In addition, the budget proposes a cut in the benefit allowance that would take between $40 and $80 a month from state employees.  (see related article)

 

“Moving money from one pocket to another is not a pay raise,” said Zearley.  “State employees must have a significant increase in their take-home pay to help them cover increasing costs to support their families.”

 

Agency Budgets Flat

 

The budget fully funds a teacher pay raise of $1,200 to bring them to the regional average.  The total cost of the raise is $65 million. 

 

In addition to the teacher pay raise, the budget proposes an additional $10 million be sent to school districts to help them pay for additional operating costs and $17.5 million to help with teacher retirement contribution increases.  The budget also includes $13 million for higher education operating costs.  No funding is provided to pay for the retirement contribution increase required of state agencies.

 

“Once again, state agencies are not provided with funding to pay for additional costs of food, fuel and medical supplies,” continued Zearley.  “State agencies have been forced to cut staff to absorb these costs.”

 

The exceptions are $1 million to the Health Department and $250,000 to the

Department of Veterans Affairs for operations.  OPEA recently learned the Health Department has put a freeze on hiring to help make up a funding shortfall for this fiscal year.

 

The governor’s budget does provide an additional $30 million to the Department of Corrections to annualize the proposed 2008 supplemental and end the cycle of underfunding the agency. 

 

The budget provides no additional staff to agencies for program growth. 

 

“We know DHS workers are doing all they can to keep up,” said Zearley.  “The workload has continued to grow each year with no additional funding for staff.”

 

 Seventeen nurses are added to the J.D. McCarty Center so that the facility can continue to be certified to receive Medicaid funds.

 

The Office of Juvenile Affairs budget has an additional $1.7 million to improve salaries for employee recruitment and retention. 

19 comments (Add your own)

1. Bob Zapffe wrote:
I was also struck by the continued focus on increasing funding to a failing common education system at the expense of state employees. The legislature continues to put inappropriate emphasis on improving state agencies' efficiency and performance, while totally ignoring the efficiency of maintaining 531 "independent" school systems. I put independent in quotes because the state is now funding such a huge percentage of their operations. This overhead can no longer be ignored as budget priorities are set.

Another surprise in the Governor's Executive Budget was the $45 million bond issue proposed for a Native American Museum and Cultural Center in Oklahoma City. No mention was made of a bond issue to replace eroding corrections facilities deemed the "worst encountered" by the MGT audit team recently.

Thu, February 7, 2008 @ 2:17 PM

2. wrote:
I don't think OPEA or any state employees should be "praising" the Governor for acknowledging us by mentioning a 5% pay raise which would be offset by a cut in health benefits!!!

Thu, February 7, 2008 @ 2:51 PM

3. Larry wrote:
This is not a pay raise. It is slight of hand. PLease Please, show p on Feb 13, 2008 and March 11, 2008 to lobby the legislature for a decent pay raise. OPEA please call for a jamming of the phone lines at the capitol.

Thu, February 7, 2008 @ 5:59 PM

4. Shelly Robinson wrote:
A five percent increase will only help out state employees if it is an annual cost of living increase- and not considered a raise. To decrease our benefit allowance in order to fund this alleged raise will not help state workers- it will only hurt them. Essentially, you are taking money out of my left pocket and expecting me to appreciate it being placed in my right pocket. I'm not sure why you feel as though this makes good economic sense- but I hope you realize that it does not. My net paycheck each month is only $1525.82. I have my husband, and he is employed- but we have 2 children still in daycare. We also have a 19 year old still in the home as well as my husband's other two children- for whom we are still paying child support. We have a monthly mortgage payment, monthly utility bills, a car payment and still have to figure out how to purchase gas and groceries. My utility bills are roughly twice what they were this time last year- but my paycheck is not increasing at all. State employees have not received a raise since 2006. When was the last time the governor and the legislators received a raise or cost of living increase? (I believe the answer is nearly (if not every, year.) I understand that Henry's wife is a teacher- and he values our teachers. I value them as well and do not want them to go without raises (although they have received them annually for the past five years)-but the over-sight the state employees consistently experience is ridiculous. I go to work every day and serve the people of Oklahoma- at least the ones in Tulsa county. My client's receive annual cost of living increases with their food stamp and social security benefits. They also benefitted from the recent increase in minimum wage- yet, I have not rec'd a raise, or a cost of living increase. You talk about the compression of incomes- yet, the client's are causing compression as their wages are getting dangerously close to the wages of state employees.

Thu, February 7, 2008 @ 8:42 PM

5. wrote:
I agree with #1. Totally. Too many school districts and administrators. Guess state employees are not considered essential or valuable for the work they do.

Fri, February 8, 2008 @ 9:15 AM

6. Deborah wrote:
I applied for a loan to buy my house several years ago and the loan officer actually laughed in my face when I told him my salary. He thought I was teasing. When he realized I was serious he said (with a red face) "you work for the State of Oklahoma and this is all you make??? Why do you still work there?" I ask myself that question quite often. I've been here over 20 years. I remember when DHS had to furlough 1 day a month so the State could have the funds to put more $$ in the pockets of the teachers. Why is DHS always the underdog? I support the teachers but why are they always first priority? They have the entire summer off! Since they are paid so much more than we are and have all that time on their hands, why not send them to DHS in the summer and have them help the workers who are back-logged with 500-750 caseloads each? I realize this is a silly statement and unrealistic...kind of like cutting someone's health benefits by $60 and giving them a raise for $60 at the same time.

Fri, February 8, 2008 @ 9:39 AM

7. VicK wrote:
I totally agree with the opinions expressed here. What's with the January 1, 2009 effective date for the pay raises? Why not July 1, 2008?

There definitely needs to be thought towards a "cost of living hike" for State Employees. The final hike that we receive after the politicians are done bargaining (and reducing) may be lower than 5% (say 3% like in earlier years).

The (annual) cost of coming to work each day for a state employee probably grew more than what additional amounts may be promised by this effort.

Fri, February 8, 2008 @ 11:00 AM

8. Lynn wrote:
I have worked for the State of almost 7 years now. I have never taken a sick day. I currently hold 530 hours of vacation time, as our agency has been short for so long we 'get' to accrue up to 624 hours of vac. Oh-and the comp time-I have comp time on the books from 2001. If I figure it all up, I can take almost 6 months off before I even dip into sick time. I know there are more out there like myself. Perhaps we should use our time. I had been saving mine for an emergency (if fired from non-merit protected unclassified at-will employee system) or lengthy illness from the stress, but I think a nice summer vacation would do us all good. We could all get another job while we are vacationing and come up with the entire $2700+ on our own. Perhaps the best day for this would be July 1st. Just about the time that many agencies are starting to run over with cases and projects for the summer months. Yup- July 1st we need to go visit our long lost cousins out of state or try our hand at another field. Maybe one that actually pays time & 1/2 for overtime instead of comp time that can't be used anyway.

Mon, February 11, 2008 @ 2:30 AM

9. ?????? wrote:
Lynn, although there are many things that need to be changed at my job with the state, being given vacation time off, being paid time & a half for backlog and using up comp time routinely are not problems in my area. It is important to be firm about your boundaries & to do these things from the moment you can. I feel part of the problem with unhappiness in the state workplace is not standing up for yourself. I have found on a number of occasions, if I cannot get my point across, OPEA has been right there to help me out. I feel good knowing I can call them & they will do whatever it takes to help the situation. I am talking about the group of people who are in office right now at OPEA. I believe we are very lucky to have them!

Mon, February 11, 2008 @ 8:10 PM

10. amos wrote:
If or when we get a pay raise, it should be across the board, not a percentage of current salary. With the percentage raise, the employees with a larger salary receive a much higher raise. The difference can be as much as a $5,000 dollar raise vs a $1,250 dollar raise. With the current economic situation, lower paid employees have more difficulty making adjustments to higher prices, but under the Governor's plan, will receive a LOWER salary increase. I pay the same for gas and food as the higher paid employees.

Mon, February 11, 2008 @ 8:37 PM

11. Ross wrote:
This is why I don't become a member of opea, its the same story over and over, and over. After 24 years of this you just flat out loose faith, I have sat back and watched the teachers get all these significant raises while we get peanuts or just a gesture. That rally March 13th won't help do anything, the budget has already been set, the govenor has already made up his mind, and there is very little else that will happen. Same ole stuff, someone needs to go hire the teachers lobbiest for opea, or someone just as good.

Mon, February 11, 2008 @ 10:26 PM

12. Rochelle wrote:
Ross you said it all in a nut shell. thanks

Tue, February 12, 2008 @ 10:39 AM

13. wrote:
Maybe we need a Governor whos wife is a state employee?

Tue, February 12, 2008 @ 2:13 PM

14. Ross is Full of BS wrote:
Ross, you are the reason we don't get anything. Pathetic people like you that "just sit back" and won't lift a finger to help. You make me sick and I wish you would retire so someone fresh and willing to help could be hired.

Tue, February 12, 2008 @ 8:40 PM

15. wrote:
The only thing OPEA fights for is their own pocket books.

Wed, February 13, 2008 @ 10:41 AM

16. wrote:
What we need is a union, like the teachers have. At least then we would have some stroke.

Wed, February 13, 2008 @ 10:43 AM

17. wrote:
Oklahoma law says that state workers can not go out on strike. That takes away our power. All we have is the power of OPEA lobby, the power of us, our friends and family voting at the polls, and the power of petition.

Mon, February 18, 2008 @ 10:31 AM

18. wrote:
Thats not enough #17, we need to change public perception of state employees. How do we do that? The only way I know is to do our job better and trim the fat(you know the one that sits around and draws a check). If the public see's one state employee not doing their job, for all they know, no state employee is doing their job. We need to get rid of this reputation. Then let the public pressure the legislature and governor.

Tue, February 19, 2008 @ 1:14 PM

19. Bob Zapffe wrote:
In the battle of teachers pay vs. state employees pay, it is interesting to note that teachers are now trying to catc up to our dependent insurance benefits allowance (pushed through by OPEA). If as big a percentage of state employees were members of OPEA as teachers are of OEA or AFT, we would be getting our COLAs just as regularly. Look at what the troopers get with 100% participation in their association. There is a bill for them this session that proposes an additional $1,000-$15,000 from Caded to head of OHP. Those funds would be better used to move all state employees toward the pay classification propsed for each job under the Hay Study, rather than singling out a single agency. I haven't heard they are having a retention problem and they already have a step raise plan built in to the salary schedule, as well as a DROP plan to sweeten retirement. We could all use those features. In summary, if you want more, give more support and time to OPEA and for Heaven's sake, JOIN.

Wed, February 20, 2008 @ 12:25 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.