OPEA Takes Interest in DHS Lawsuit - Attends Committee Meetings

The same day Oklahomans received news that a national child advocacy organization was filing a class action lawsuit against the state of Oklahoma’s child welfare system, Senator Patrick Anderson’s SB 1525 was heard before the Senate Subcommittee on Human Services.

 

SB 1525, which mandates that child welfare caseloads not exceed the national standard, would require that an additional 197 workers are hired at a cost of $16.27 million. 

 

Anderson referred to DHS Field Operations Division Director Larry Johnson, when asked about the effect of the bill. 

 

“More staff would mean more visits, which would allow us to watch children more closely,” said Johnson.  “The Child Welfare League of America establishes caseload standards based on the work that needs to be done.”

 

Senator Nancy Riley asked Janis Hendryx, Director of the Commission of Children and Youth, about the need for a caseload standard.

 

“I believe there are pockets where the caseloads are too high,” said Hendryx.  “Child welfare needs to be a job that people can do well.”

 

“It is hard to keep up,” said Senator Judy Eason-McIntyre, a former child welfare worker.  “If you miss one visit, you pray that nothing happens.”

 

“Workers come and go because the job is so challenging,” she concluded.  “If anything goes wrong newspapers focus on the worker.”

 

The bill passed the committee with one dissenting vote, Senator John Ford.

 

“I have trouble with a national organization telling us what our caseloads should be,” said Ford.

10 comments (Add your own)

1. Jann Ensz wrote:
Maybe Sen Ford should work as a child welfare worker and see how he likes the caseload they now have.

February 15, 2008 @ 5:04 PM

2. wrote:
Where are they going to Find the Social Workers for Child Welfare when the Universities are not turning out Grad with degrees in Social Work?

February 15, 2008 @ 7:19 PM

3. ?????? wrote:
You do not have to have a degree in social work to work child welfare. You can have degrees in a related field such as psychology or sociology. They have relaxed the standards to include a number of other degrees such as fine arts & business. I think it makes the job harder for people without a social science background, but a number of people seem to do it.

February 15, 2008 @ 7:38 PM

4. EL wrote:
O.U. has a Master's degree in social work. DHS will pay for this if you work for them.

February 16, 2008 @ 1:34 PM

5. ?????? wrote:
I now several "good" child welfare workers that have Criminal Justice Degrees and Business Degrees that does the job just as well as other degrees. People should be glad that there are others that do this jobs too or there caseloads would even be more challenging. Especially considering the wages. I no longer work for the DHS because of the low wages of Family Support and Child Welfare. It is sad what they are paying state employees because most of them do work really hard to provide a better Oklahoma. Good job to all of you that continue to do good things for the state, but it is sad that they don't pay any of the DHS workers what they are worth!

February 17, 2008 @ 4:04 PM

6. Marta wrote:
Where exactly does this organization think the money will come from to pay for more workers? I know there have been too many issues lately, but unless more money is given to DHS to hire more workers, then the crisis will continue, and I don't believe a law-suit is the way to solve the problem. Perhaps the Child-Welfare League should volunteer their time to help the already over-worked caseworkers instead of making unfair accusations!

February 18, 2008 @ 9:38 PM

7. ???? wrote:
A big problem is the power in DHS is concentrated within a few people. THEN, (when the workers-note-they are not called SOCIAL workers at the state) when case loads are sky high interests of families & social workers are compromised. DHS does NOT want the feds to come in. If everything was okay, the feds would not have a shot at taking control of DHS.

February 23, 2008 @ 9:53 AM

8. ?? wrote:
What about the two case workers who are facing charges downtown in regard to their jobs with DHS? Could this be related to case load overload or is it training or is it DHS failure to protect their employees from prosection? How are you going to get people to come to work for DHS if everybody knows you can pick up a charge-not for theft or fraud-but just for working at DHS?

February 23, 2008 @ 9:57 AM

9. Calling Out all State Employees wrote:
EVERYONE AIM TO BE AT THE MARCH 11 LOBBY RALLY BETWEEN 11:00 TO 12:30 THAT IS WHEN THE MEDIA WILL BE THERE. YOU WANT THE STATE EMPLOYEES TO GIVE A STRONG SUPPORT FOR OUR CAUSE TO LET THE LEGISLATURES AND THE GOVERNOR AND THE PEOPLE AT HOME WE ARE TIRED OF NOT GETTING WHAT WE DESERVE AND THAT IS A PAY RAISE AND TO NOT TOUCH OUR BENEFITS.

I LIKE THE IDEA SOMEONE GAVE WE SHOULD POST ON BULLETINS BOARDS HOW WE ARE BEING IGNORED HOW BAD OUR PAY IS TO THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY THAT I BELIEVE WE ARE NOW LAST IN THE UNITED STATES IN STATE WORKERS PAY. LET THEM KNOW THAT SOON THERE WON'T BE ANY STATE WORKERS TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF OKLAHOMA BECAUSE WE WILL BE GONE TO THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY WITH OUR EXPERIENCE ON THE JOB.

IF ANYTHING IMPROVE OUR BENEFITS THAT HASN'T BEEN DONE IN A WHILE.

*RETURN OUR 90 BACK TO 80 THAT IT USED TO BE.
*INCREASE THE STATE CONTRIBUTION OF $25 TO OUR SOONER SAVE. MOST PRIVATE INDUSTRY HAS THE 401K WHICH MATCH WHAT YOU PUT IN BUT THE STATE ONLY PUTS IN $25.
*INCREASE OUR LONGEVITY THAT HASN'T BEEN IMPROVED SINCE IT STARTED.
*GIVE US AN EXTRA 1 OR 2 HRS A MONTH TOWARD OUR SICK OR ANNUAL.
*TRY TO LOWER OUR HEALTH INSURANCE COST WHICH IS OUTRAGESLY HIGH COMPARED TO THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY.
*IMPROVE OUR RETIREMENT SO THAT PEOPLE CAN AFFORD TO RETIRE SOONER BEFORE WE ARE DEAD.

February 27, 2008 @ 10:24 AM

10. Linda wrote:
Where are you going to find the extra 197 child welfare workers. There are dozens of these jobs currently posted that they can't fill now due to the low pay. Just creating empty positions will not help, and the only way DHS is going to get these positions filled, and keep them filled is to pay good employees a fair market rate for their work.

I don't work in child welfare. I work in Child Support (the same pay scale and minimum job requirments) and we have the same problem. We have a 40% turn over rate for employee's within the first 2 years of employment and about 3/4 of those cite the low pay as the reason they found another job. They simply cannot live on what DHS is paying.

March 4, 2008 @ 9:31 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.