Pension Reform on Legislative Agenda

 

One of the most important legislative sessions for state employees will convene February 7 at the state capitol. Sixty bills have been filed to change public employee pension funds.

 

States across the nation are looking for solutions to the public pension funding crisis. Last year, several states cut retiree cost-of-living-adjustment assumptions, raised the retirement age, and increased contributions for participants. In most states, the changes applied to new hires only, with current employees and retirees still maintaining their benefits.

 

In Oklahoma, the fight will be about COLAs for retirees. Last year, for the first time in almost twenty years, the legislature failed to provide a COLA to public pension retirees in an election year. Several bills have been filed to eliminate or seriously hamper the legislature’s ability to grant COLAs for retirees.

 

“OPERS retirees have an average annual benefit of less than $15,000 per year, which is the lowest of any other pension system in the state,” said OPEA Policy and Research Director Trish Frazier. “With benefits based on salaries that are 16 percent below market, retirees must have COLAs to keep up with increasing costs of medication, food and fuel.”

 

Legislation to Watch

 

Below are some of the bills OPEA will be watching this session. Shell bills, which are only titles with no language, are not included in this list. Watch the OPEA website for updates to the list of bills.

 

HB 2057 (Rep. Lewis Moore): Prohibits cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for retirees in the state’s pension systems until the funding level of the system is at least 85 percent.

 

HB 2132 (Speaker Kris Steele) and SB 891 (Sen. Mike Mazzei): These bills remove COLAs from the definition of “non-fiscal retirement bill,” which requires that the legislature to provide funding for COLAs. With the serious budget situation facing the state, this legislation would eliminate COLAs for the foreseeable future.

 

SB 787 (Sen. Mike Mazzei) and SB 806 (Sen,. Josh Brecheen): These bills lower the retirement benefits of elected officials, bringing them more in line with the benefits state employees receive.

 

SB 810 (Sen. Clark Jolley): Transfers the assets of CompSource to the Teachers Retirement System to help pay for the unfunded liability of the system.

 

SB 811 (Sen. Clark Jolley): Transfers the assets of GRDA to the Oklahoma Public Retirement System to help pay for the unfunded liability of the system.

 

HB 1907 and HB 1950 (Rep. Mike Jackson): Provides a four percent COLA to OPERS retirees. (HB 1907 and 1950 are OPEA requested bills.)

For Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit Terms click here.

For Pension Actions in Other States click here.

6 comments (Add your own)

1. Corrections Employee wrote:
People seem to think, well, this only effects new hires, folks, this is how it starts. Look at Michigan and New Jersey and see what has happened to those State pensions. It's time we all work together and fight this fight together as one.

Fri, November 5, 2010 @ 1:28 PM

2. bobby wrote:
It would help if you list what changes occurred in states that you reference when posting comments. I spent several hours researching the future notice of changes to the pension that Colorado employees get as referenced in the OPEA link. It indicated that it was directed at currrent and inactive employees. Inative meaning those that vested and quit and not current retirees. I am concerned for all retirement members but hope that any posts that do not refer to changes for current retirees indicate so. It would lessen the stress of retirees who are dependant on their check and do not have the option of continuing their employment to pay their bills. I have accepted that COLAS are a thing of the past. I will fight against any changes to the retirement system.

Mon, November 8, 2010 @ 7:17 AM

3. Bud wrote:
Google it bobby, found the info in about 3 minutes.

Mon, November 8, 2010 @ 8:49 AM

4. bobby wrote:
Bud, I indicated in my post that I spent two hours finding and interpeting the Colorado ruling. I passed it along in my post. I googled Michigan and came up with numerous pages of links. I guess I can open and read each one until I find what I need. I see no reason why we can not help each other out with info we find so that each person who has an interest in the information does not have to spend time trying to find it. A lot of us older retirees may not be as internet informed as you are. We need to help each other so that we can be informed on a very important topic.

Mon, November 8, 2010 @ 10:29 AM

5. Bud wrote:
The New Jersey article is from March 22, 2010 and starts out saying (N.J. Gov. Chris Christie signs pension, benefits changes for state employees). It's from NJ.Com. The same changes are being done in Michigan however will be challenged in court. I've been following this for the past year and feel confident that we are protected by the Constitution in the matter of keeping pensions in tact for existing employees. I do however see new hires going to a 401K and also an increase in employee contributions. Hope this helps.

Wed, November 10, 2010 @ 2:25 PM

6. protagonist wrote:
I would also like to see current employee's with more than 15 years left until retirement be given the option to switch over.

It could be done very easily using the existing soonersave accounts. And I know I can manage that better than these yahoos can.

Wed, January 19, 2011 @ 8:15 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.