Public Safety Agencies Present Budget

Eight Public Safety agencies struggling with budget cut scenarios for 2011 presented a bleak outlook to the combined House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Public Safety Subcommittee.  The meeting attended by OPEA served as a reminder that the next fiscal year will be tough.

 

The legislative committee asked several public safety agencies to present scenarios for budget cuts ranging from 7.5 percent to 12.5 percent.

 

Agency director Joe Robertson from the Indigent Defense Fund told the committee the agency has fewer employees and is struggling with the work load. 

 

“The agency has eliminated 18 positions and has implemented furloughs,” said Robertson.  “We will begin FY 2011 down $900,000 because of some grant money that will run out, even if our state funding remains the same.”

 

Director Tom Jordon from the Medical Examiner’s office explained that deep budget cuts would result in the laying off of a third of his work force.  The agency is struggling to win back national accreditation revoked last July because of inadequate staffing levels and outdated equipment.  The agency currently has a backlog of 959 cases.

 

Department of Public Safety Commissioner Kevin Ward told the joint House and Senate budget panel that more than a dozen proposed fee hikes or new fees would generate an estimated $32.8 million for the cash-strapped agency.

 

Ward said that among the other proposals are raising the driver’s license reinstatement fee from $25 to $50, doubling the cost of size and weight permits, and increasing parking fines and collision report costs.

 

Ward said the agency also is considering closing driver’s license exam sites in 10 rural communities: Grove, Kingfisher, Stilwell, Vinita, Weatherford, Heavener, Roland, Spiro, Stigler and Talihina.

Ward also explained he is looking at 23 days of furloughs for workers in the next fiscal year. 

 

OPEA, the only Association to testify about the agency budgets told lawmakers that the cuts in public safety agencies without a thought to raising fees was unconscionable. 

 

“Sure these are tough economic times and employees in every agency are worried about budget cuts,” said OPEA Deputy Director Scott Barger.  “But, deeper cuts into public safety will only serve to break the back of the law enforcement community.”

 

“Additional budget cuts, furloughs, low staffing and below market salaries do nothing but place greater stress on employees who should be concentrating fully on protecting the public and returning home to their families,” said Barger.  “Not being distracted by the state’s budget concerns.” 

 

Further cuts would mean slashing even more employees who watch over a growing number of inmates, Department of Corrections director Justin Jones said, raising “just one new red flag after another that in my business is indicative that you’re heading for a train wreck.”

 

By far the largest component of public safety appropriations is the state’s prison system, which has an annual budget of about $500 million. But cuts to last year’s budget reduced that appropriation to $461 million, Jones said.

 

The agency already has reduced budgets at various facilities, eliminated treatment programs for drug and sex offenders and offered voluntary buyouts that were accepted by 119 employees.

 

The state’s prison system, which has added about 640 inmates since July 1, currently is at 99-percent capacity. More cuts, Jones warned, would lead to mandatory furloughs of all employees for 23 days each year, along with eliminating between 659 and 987 workers.

 

Oklahoma already incarcerates more women per capita than any other state, and ranks fourth nationally in the overall incarceration rate, Jones said. Couple that with reduced budgets, a growing number of inmates and a correctional officer-to-inmate ratio over nearly 9 to 1, and conditions are ideal for a major prison problem.

 

State lawmakers have about $1.2 billion less to spend this year than they did last year. Even after tapping cash reserves and federal stimulus money, budget cuts of more than $500 million will be necessary without any new sources of revenue.

 

“OPEA has met with legislative leaders regarding FY 2011 budget talks,” said Barger.  “It certainly is stacking up to be a difficult year if only state government takes cuts.  higher education and common education must take their share as well.  Then and only then can we spare state employees.”

24 comments (Add your own)

1. #### wrote:
they won't cut education under this governor.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 8:08 AM

2. Lance wrote:
Session end May 28th, (1 month), and they are asking how 7.5 to 12.5 cuts will affect budgets? What is wrong with our legislature. They should have covered all this in months 1-4. The writing seems to be on the wall for the Republicans. They have cut taxes too much. It's time to step up and make the hard choices if they intend to have a State Government. The focus needs to be on revenue, not abortion, illegals, and any other "make me feel good" type stuff. And this crap about saving the State money is a joke. Not until Education is involved in budget cuts will I think they're serious, especially since Education gets 52 Percent of our tax dollars. The rest of the State has to function on the leftovers of 48%.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:00 AM

3. Glenn wrote:
Why does every school have to have a Superintendent? Some schools have hardly 100 kids and other a couple thousand. Any county with a population of less that 25,000 should have no more than on Supreintendent. That would save millions!

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:31 AM

4. Janice Brower wrote:
While I am not a member of OPEA, I am writing to inform you that all the library technicians in the DOC (of which there are 4) are being let go. I will be working until May 28, 2010. The other 3 are gone.

After 23 years (how long I worked for DOC) I guess no job is safe.

I wish everyone well.

Janice Brower
Lib. Tech III
Jim E. Hamilton Correctional Center

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:36 AM

5. State Employee wrote:
CONSOLIDATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS!!!! We have too many high paid superintendants (with their staff) Problem solved!

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:43 AM

6. Cindy wrote:
Where are their cutbacks? Get rid of that damned pork barrel spending, it could fund the whole state.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:49 AM

7. Elizabeth wrote:
Is is not fair that education goes untouched! They have received raises every yr. from the Governor and their insurance preminums are paid. They get long holidays and the summers off -- get real! We're working our tails off and receiving more and more responsibilities daily with no more pay, getting sick and our families are suffering too. Is it going to get your attention when we have employees die in the line of duty?? It will be too late then. Stop padding the big boys salaries too!

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:51 AM

8. Donna wrote:
Like it or not we are going to pay for this in the end. Like the off shore drilling rig that exploded......who is paying for it? We are in higher gas prices. The state has a budget cut and who pays for it.....we will in paying more for drivers licenses and where ever else they can increase to make up the difference. Just like working for the state and budget cuts in D.O.C. who will pay for it?.......We will with furloughs and less people to manage facilities putting our lives in danger.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:52 AM

9. Parole Officer wrote:
REPUBLICANS HAVE CUT TAXES WAY TOO MUCH. COMMON SCHOOLS AND HIGHER EDUCATION SHOULD TAKE A CUT JUST LIKE OTHER STATE AGENCIES. PUBLIC SAFETY SHOULD HAVE PRIORITY!!! TIME FOR SOME REAL LEADERSHIP!!

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:55 AM

10. Parole Officer wrote:
CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR JUSTIN JONES IS CORRECT WHEN HE SAYS WE ARE HEADING FOR A TRAIN WRECK. ALL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND INSTITUTIONAL PERSONNEL KNOW THAT TO BE A FACT.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 11:58 AM

11. Jeff wrote:
You should also see the salary of those Superintendents. You would be VERY surprised to see how much they are making a year.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 12:04 PM

12. Sheryl Parker wrote:
Quit giving so many tax breaks/credits (ie: Thunder basketball). Take the governor out of the parole process. This has been suggested many times-yet NOONE seems to be listening. Prison system is over flowing and although I work at one of the correctional centers-never have I feared for my safety as I do now. Our officers are running on fumes along with our nurses. I wonder how long can they hold out till someone really makes a BAD mistake, etc.?

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 12:06 PM

13. George wrote:
Why are we paying the School Superintendents a huge amount of salary? I agree, they must be paid decent salary, but not above $ 100,000. Most school superintendents' are making above $ 100K salary. Also the salary of University presidents and the Chancellor of Higher Eduction also needs to be reduced below $ 100,000 or $ 150,000.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 12:11 PM

14. xxxxx wrote:
The State should offer some sort of package for any State employee to separate from service. Even those who do not have years of service. I'm sure there would be more than you think take it.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 1:31 PM

15. George II wrote:
I fully agree with the comments regarding the school superintendents and administrators. The education system is swimming in assistant administrators. I read in the Lawton paper recently that the Lawton Public School system had 37 administrators besides the superintendent and principals. What to they do?
What did the State of Oklahoma do when the price of a barrel of oil was below $20.00 and no casinos contributed to education funding? What has been added to the budget since the lste 80's and 90's when the budget was around $5 billion? Whatever has been added should just be cut.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 1:54 PM

16. Local Yocal wrote:
The 9 to 1 ratio (officer to offender)is a correct figure, but still misleading. That is the overall figure, not the shift by shift figure. On a shift basis it is more like 90 to 1. (90 Offenders for every 1 officer). Add to that support staff cuts/buy outs it is getting very scary. On Education, has anyone as Sandy Garrett, "Where has all the lottery money been spent?" Education never takes cuts in tax revenues plus receives (according to the commericals) millions a year from the lottery and they can't meet their budget. Education must have a tape worm in its system.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 2:13 PM

17. Debi wrote:
Education is very top heavy and needs to be consolidated. Some salaries top what the Director of Education makes. Also, instead of pumping more money into a mediocre system, why not figure out how to up parent involvement, that's what makes kids successful. As far as DOC, they may lose a valuble program that actually saves the state money which is Community Sentencing. That program is making a difference in cost and in lives. Legislators need to think about that. Where is the support???

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 2:49 PM

18. ####### wrote:
All of the ideas suggested are right. Is anyone listening though? All of these cost saving measures and other ideas have been submitted for years and they always fall on deaf ears.
These are desperate times and call for desperate measures. The time for talking about the problems is over and it is time for something to get done. Even though a sales tax increase is unpopular, it is needed now to help fund the state agencies. Also, we will have to look at more commutations and letting some non-violent offenders go. Tough decisions need to be made and our Legislature needs to get busy and make them.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 2:52 PM

19. Debbie wrote:
If DOC has more cuts, I will probably lose my job. I have been with the state for 14 years and planned on retiring from this agency. I finished my degree while in service so I could be a better benefit to the state. Now I will get to worry about losing my home and paying my bills. I can't believe the legislature wants to make more cuts to an agency that is running on fumes. And to see programs like Community Sentencing threatened that save the state money and actually cut down on recidivism is ridiculous.

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 3:01 PM

20. #### wrote:
XXXXX
Isn't that what the VOBO's are?

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 3:22 PM

21. wrote:
working in a facility is already dangerous and the potential for injury raises daily. more drugs are coming in cell phones tobacco and we are working with young inexperience employees. The offenders are getting tougher with the gang problems growing and the gangs are growing. To many people who do not work day to day inside have no clue of what is going on or how we are going without staff safety supplies. Try to remember these offender are going to be your neighbors one day and we need experienced people to do re-entry and security. we are the exsample they look at before they go back to the streets.So if we can not take care of our own budget and our own workers then what have they got to look forward to to re-enter a job market that is not there, no housing. So what is next?

Wed, April 28, 2010 @ 4:24 PM

22. Youngster wrote:
I have worked for DOC for the past 5 years, and I am what some may call "young and inexperienced"... yet I do my job well and I do it along with a few other jobs that are not in my pay grade and/or job description. I feel like I am a great asset to this agency, I work my rear end off for this agency, yet I never feel appreciated. There are some things that I believe are just completely unfair within DOC. For instance, PAYING OFFENDERS TO LAY IN BED ALL DAY LONG!!! From my understanding every facility except for 3 in this state give a paycheck (gang pay) to each offender on their yard each month, whether or not they have a job in their facility! If that isn't a waste of $$$ I don't know what is! Besides that, can anybody tell me why we pay any of them in the first place?? I realize that it promotes good behavior, but if you ask me getting "good boy time" subtracted from your sentence would be a heck of an incentive! I wish some of our "older, experienced" state employees would have realized this much sooner. I could only imagine how much money we have contributed to the infamous "DRAIN". FYI- I just learned that all offenders in the state, with or without a job will be receiving pay each month beginning May 1. Shouldn't they be paying our law abiding citizens back for the roof over their head, food in their mouth and FREE HEALTH CARE!!!??? Just an idea...

Thu, April 29, 2010 @ 12:41 PM

23. bh wrote:
youngster-you are wise beyond your years, but as a 20yr veteran you aint seen nothin yet. How about hug a thug day were we give em' cheeseburgers and ice-cream. Our yard use to be a work camp, now it's like you say-lay on their butts and watch tv-smoke dope and talk on their cellphones-cause heaven forbid if we try to do our jobs and take back control of our prisons by enforcing the rules we are subject to disc action/ I feel sorry for you young guys, I'm on my way out.Hang tuff it will come back around when we get a new Director which I hope isn't too far away.

Thu, April 29, 2010 @ 7:34 PM

24. Vickie wrote:
Why are the superintendants have to be in a different building with several staff......When I was in school, we had one superintendant and no assistant and no other staff. Worked just fine. Lot less expense, get rid of the buildings away from school, they need to be where the kids are anyway. Get rid of extra staff. What do they all do anyway???

Tue, May 4, 2010 @ 10:02 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.